On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jonathan Rickman wrote: > I just noticed that the reply-to is now set to all. IMHO this is the worst > possible configuration. It creates duplicate messages when mistakes are > made. I know there are two sides of the reply-to argument, but this is > far from a compromise. Now you have the worst of both sides. No it's not. It's set to list (at least now) later, chris