[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Shell Scripting for Compatiblity
- Subject: [ale] Shell Scripting for Compatiblity
- From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:28:11 -0400
bash is the place to start. It should be compatible with most other
variants, but will very likely seriously break with csh. Really not
much you can do about that. Most all unix systems come with some
variant of the bourne shell. You might consider using:
#!/bin/sh
Since, I believe, most all UNIX variants have /bin/sh default to bourne.
aaron wrote:
> I couple months back I demoed the Worker file manager for a central
> meeting "Tip Jar" segment. I showed how the utility can easily be
> extended via a little shell script I wrote for it which added batch
> file.ext and sequential file renaming. Worker's author would now like
> to include my little script contribution with his future releases,
> but I want to make sure the script is as broadly Unix compatible as
> possible... the Worker interface is pure xwindows so it will run on
> most any *nix variant.
>
> Currently the program is working in bash, which is specified in the
> she-bang: #!/bin/bash
>
> I'm looking for recommendations on which (mostly compatible) Unix
> shells I should also consider targeting and testing this with. It
> would also be helpful to hear about any general compatibility syntax
> differences to watch for (along the lines of a freqently misspelled
> words list).
>
> Assistance appreciated!
>
> peace aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
--
Until later: Geoffrey esoteric at 3times25.net
The latest, most widespread virus? Microsoft end user agreement.
Think about it...
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale