[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Nuke non-ALE spam

Subject: [ale] Nuke non-ALE spam
From: jcphil at mindspring.com (Jim Philips)
Date: Sun Dec 7 15:06:52 2003
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sunday 07 December 2003 11:11 am, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> I do it the other way. I have a dedicated mailbox for spam. It's called
> "INBOX". Everything that is _not_ filtered to a separate box is spam.

I'm sure this approach works for you. But I don't think it would work for 
everybody. For my part:

unexpected<>spam

References:
- [ale] Nuke non-ALE spam
  - From: transam at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)
- [ale] Nuke non-ALE spam
  - From: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)

Prev by Date: [ale] Nuke non-ALE spam
Next by Date: [ale] Current Red Hat users - moving on?
Previous by thread: [ale] Nuke non-ALE spam
Next by thread: [ale] Current Red Hat users - moving on?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread