[ale] [Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net: Reiser vs EXT3]

[jimpop at rocketship.com (Jim Popovitch)]

Hi Robert,

I have seen similar... and have just assumed that Reiser was more robust due
to it's age.  It is also worth pondering whether ext3 has more overhead
since it continuously maintains ext2 compatibility along the way.

-Jim P.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nomad the Wanderer [mailto:nomad at rdlg.net]On Behalf Of Robert L.
> Harris
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:54 AM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: [ale] [Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net: Reiser vs EXT3]
>
>
>
> I bounced this to the Kernel list but they may be a bit busy with the
> new release.  Thoughts/theories?
>
>
>   Still working on that replacement mail server and a new rumor has hit
> the mix.  It follows that reiserfs is much faster than ext3 (made ext3,
> not converted from ext2 if it matters) and this is causing some
> problems.  On a 200Gig filesystem is this truely an issue?
>
> Thanks,
>   Robert
>
>
> :wq!
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Robert L. Harris
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>       These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.
> FYI:
>  perl -e 'print
> $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
>
>
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info.
> Problems should be
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>
>



---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.