[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Websites
- Subject: [ale] Websites
- From: ale at FultonGreen.com (Fulton Green)
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 03:15:12 -0400
Seems like we've had this conversation before (or something similar) ...
For me, it boils down to one question: how much do you care about your
site looking good in NS 4.x? If you're willing to forego the still 4% of
those users (according to one of those web surveys whose sponsor I now
forget), then by all means proceed with Strict. Personally, I chose
Transitional b/c my client wanted the page's background and default text
color in NS 4.x to be consistent w/how they appeared in other browsers, and
the only way to make that work out was to use the color attributes in the
<body> tag that only appeared in the Transition version (no, the equivalent
CSS directives don't do the trick).
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:55:54AM -0400, Christopher R. Curzio wrote:
> > I'd also recommend going with XHTML 1.0 Transitional
>
> Why Transitional? Why not Strict?
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.