[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] kernel frustrations
- Subject: [ale] kernel frustrations
- From: pfrostie at yahoo.com (phrostie)
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 09:04:24 -0500
for give my ignorance but what are DMA and PIO modes.
acctually it's slower in 2.4 with the errors than when i'm running the 2.2.
i'm guessing it's spending a lot of time writting error messages.
anyway hdparm -i /dev/hda gives:
<snip>
/dev/hda:
Model=WDC WD300AB-00BVA0, FwRev=21.01H21, SerialNo=WD-WMA7H1453518
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=40
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=off
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=-66060037, LBA=yes, LBAsects=58633344
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 *mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no
Drive Supports : Reserved : ATA-1 ATA-2 ATA-3 ATA-4 ATA-5
</snip>
>
> My first stab: are you running in DMA mode of > 2 (UDMA 66 or 100?)
> with a 40 pin cable? Usually, the driver recognizes this, and disallows
> it. Try 'hdparm -i /dev/hda' to see what it sez.
>
> Another stab would be to see if it happens in PIO mode. It can be
> incredibly slower, but you'd rather have it slow and right rather than
> fast and wrong....
--
Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS,
and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings.
http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/
http://www.freelists.org/list/cad-linux
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.