[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] UNIX equivalent of Windows DLL
- Subject: [ale] UNIX equivalent of Windows DLL
- From: dalavon at yahoo.com (Jim Williams)
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
It will bring over thousands of apps. There was a
disscussion on /. about this a couple of weeks ago.
Just think of all the Delphi apps that will just need
a recompile. Think about a shop that has been using
delphi for awhile, now it will be real easy for them
to jump into the Linux sandbox. I am not a Delphi
expert but others commented on /. that boreland for
the most part avoided win 32 specific calls with
delphi.
--- Dan Newcombe <Newcombe at mordor.clayton.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Russell Enderby wrote:
> > Actually not too long ago, it was mentioned that
> Borland's entire compiler
> > suite would be ported over to Linux. That is my
> favorite development suite
> > anyhow. It will bring thousands of apps to Linux
> overnight. Linux is in
> > real good shape.
>
> I don't follow the logic - how does having Borland
> compilers for linux
> bring apps over? All the compiler does is take
> WinMain, MessageBox, and
> all the other Win32 calls and compile and link them.
> Without having the
> win32 libraries behind it, apps would still not work
> and probably not
> compile on Linux. Even if an app was 100% OWL
> (absolutley NO windows
> calls), the OWL would still need to be rewritten to
> not use Win32.
>
> There are twho things that'll get "thousands of apps
> to Linux overnight".
> - A working Wine
> - ALL of Win32/MFC/ATL, etc... ported to Linux.
>
> I'll put my money on Wine
>
>
>
=====
Jim Williams
Software Developer, ICC/GRSoftware
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com