[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] VPN's
- Subject: [ale] VPN's
- From: maltzen at mm.com (Gary Maltzen)
- Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:25:00 -0500
I would guess that SSH telnet is more reliable because it uses short
packets. What you may need is a way to decrease the MTU of packets routed
through the VPN, if that's even possible...
How does a conventional ftp session between Atlanta and Austin compare to
the same between Atlanta and Canada?
(We're using NT-based Aventail VPN between Minneapolis and Seattle;
traceroute says we're routed through New York).
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Tynor <tynor at outside.atlanta.twr.com>
This is exactly what we do (and your guess even happens to match the
subnet numbers we are using on each subnet :-)).
Only traffic destined from one subnet to the other gets routed through
the tunnel. That's all happening correctly. The problem is that the
tunnel itself (10.0.1<->1.0.2) is unreliable.
Steve