[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] /proc/interrupts
- Subject: [ale] /proc/interrupts
- From: randy.dunlap at intel.com (Dunlap, Randy)
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 07:38:39 -0700
I don't think it's an error either. It's just that IRQ 13
is associated with floating point exceptions (match coprocessor,
built-in, or even floating point emulation software).
~Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux Idiot [mailto:esoteric at denali.atlnet.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 1998 5:52 AM
> To: Ben Phillips
> Cc: ale at cc.gatech.edu
> Subject: Re: [ale] /proc/interrupts
>
>
> Ben Phillips wrote:
> >
> > It's not really an error AFAIK, I'm just looking at what I
> see when I cat
> > /proc/interrupts.
> >
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > > Is it for IRQ 13 (hex 0d)? This is an old AT standard for
> > > floating point exceptions. What kind of processor are you using?
> >
> > Yes, it is on 13. It's an old 486SX. D'you suppose it's
> there because of
> > some real error, or because it's an interrupt set up to
> catch errors if they
> > happen?
>
> Just rebooted my box to win95 and irq 13 is assigned to the math
> coprocessor... ??
>
> >
> > __ _
> > Ben Phillips / '_' ) ,,, "I wish I
> could file suits
> > pynk at cc.gatech.edu | | ()|||||||||[:::) against
> stupidity. The world
> > \__.-._) ''' would become a jail."
> > -- Cybervox
>
> --
> Until later: Geoffrey esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
>
> You mean you paid MONEY for Service Pack '98????
>