[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Linux Distributions
- Subject: [ale] Linux Distributions
- From: mhw at wittsend.com (Michael H. Warfield)
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 11:07:05 -0400 (EDT)
> Well, whenever you start talking distributions, we all want to put in our
> two cents. I was brought up on Slackware and migrated to Red Hat for most
> of the reasons already mentioned. I do want to point out, rpm can be used
> for Slackware if you really like BSD init (www.rpm.org), and I too have had
> occasional problems with Red Hat install/upgrades.
> About the relocation of config file that Mike mentioned above, although I
> was a little lost at first, I much prefer this. IMHO config files belong in
> /etc and libraries belong in lib. It always irked me when certain commercial
> Un*xes would place binaries (i.e. ping) in /etc, thats what the (s)bin's are
> for.
This is actually kind of humorous because "/sbin" is a relative
newcomer on the block. The use of /etc for administrative utilities
(and /stand for standalone utilities) dates way WAY back. They're just
doing things the old "traditional" way. Sun, I believe, originated the
convention of "/var" for system variable directories so that / and /usr
file systems could be mounted read-only. I'm not exactly sure where in
the evolutionary line "/sbin" and "/usr/sbin" appeared although I don't
mourn the extinction of "/stand"... :-)
It would be entertaining to do an evolutionary tree of when certain
conventions made there appearance and when certain others became extinct
(for all practical purposes).
> Later
> Jay
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> E-Mail: Jay Munsterman<jmunster at mindspring.com>
> Date: 30-Sep-97
> Time: 08:53:12
> PGP public Key:
> http://www.mindspring.com/~jmunster/pubkey.html
> --------------------------------------------------------
>